Only consciousness is observational.
And our observational style is ordained upon methods
of viewing and cognition in which nothing really exists
in that self-conscious way.
Everything is deeply related and interactional with
everything else and immediately so.
Yet we go about with conclusions of depiction
that are not extensively inclusive
towards an understanding of the deeper
and massive implications of how all things are
as much as we are satisfied with a definitional sense
that meets our cognition standards of naming and defining
but do not truly implicate or immerse
in the extensive nature of how all things
truly interactional function ongoing.
We live confined by our attention span
and the functional limitations of our thinking procedures
and methods which we then impose on what we observe
as meeting whatever that is in its nature,
that we relate to as a functionally dynamic environment
and that is not at all in the deepest sense true.
We never left the arm chair
of our convenient and familiar viewing styles
and then make assumptions of comprehension
that basically only are reflections of our mind styles
for observing that do not necessarily provide
for in depth participation in what we have identified
or that we claim it be by our observational methods.
We have failed to master,
in the first order, the self-sense;
in the way we are all part of that interactional environment
and actively functioning in it.
That we have a sense to be self-conscious about it,
falsely precludes a distance from that world
but only as a separation from within ourselves
in doing what we do and calling that observational
and defining the world by that means.
This automatically has a built in failure trait
because it finds a means of acknowledgment
in which we are not fluid with that world
that we so claim separate status from.
For there is no objectivity,
in the true sense of all mass being interactive
at the very subtle levels,
which have become and are ongoing
beyond our sensory range to claim or define
or consciously participate.
We are thought-form solipsistic unto ourselves
for not having delved more directly
into how we have a consciousness
and instead have it filled with almost a religion
of self-consciousness to the point
that an overlay of superficiality is intended
as complete and unified distraction
from a deeper sentience with all of matter in a primary way. And we persist with this premise
as our means of furthering our deeper understanding
of everything from the standpoint of name and function
but not from the process of alignment and integration
with and from within.
We seem to lack the brain styles
to be simpatico or vibrational empathy
as a living forward
and uniformly agree to what and all we agree to
without further examination of our methods
of brain development and refinement of consciousness
in doing so.
We seem to lack the think skills that places us in alignment
and yet produce thoughts in a conclusion status
that give us descriptions as suppositions
and distance in doing so in this manner.
Below the surface of all of this,
placebo functions, healers succeed, prayer gets results, individual people communicate with other species,
plants experience our feelings,
water knows more than we do,
and the quantum of life
generally remains outside our range of awareness directly.
So much for the relative value of our consciousness
milling around in the relative land where at best,
all we do is agree to agree amongst ourselves
as an entitled species unto itself
and thereby its own imprisonment undisclosed . . .