no moment is ever the same
as a previous moment
because there is only one moment
and that the method of retention
cues on repeatability
and therefore sacrifices the riches of the moment
for the gloss-possibility of carriage of memory
from the last moment into the next
as if that concept actually works
towards richness and depth of being.
that fallacy produces self as audience
and clipped versions that contrast and compared
to sustain a notion of next mount revisited
as an ongoing to the last
in a mindset way.
therefore almost all skill-sets for awareness
that humans possess
get culled down to service in this style
and feature what provides
for this ongoing view
of this moment to moment
as a slideshow set in motion
by the insatiable ever-screen viewing used
as each frame
is further recognition confirming.
all of which takes us out of this moment
in anticipation of featuring the next
as a form of superficial engagement
in our notion of a reality format.
therefore now never fully comes into existence.
we are not able to engage and immerse
in that depth of presence.
all mental faculties are cuing towards that gloss
that has become
recognition’s stance in a mindful way.
this is the difference between looking to see
and gazing to be.
in a see-world, there are lots of things identified
and therefore things to look at
for recognition purposes.
in a gaze-world, there is as we are.
any recognition has no audience elements
to distinctively intake.
our reality has extra unnecessary parts
of self-participation
that keep us from actually being present with,
as part of.
our version of integration requires all else
to matter to us,
in meaningful ways
without regard to how all else
truly integratively works
in the bigger picture
that we have no frame
of personal reference for.
we exist, in our minds,
as standalones,
experiencing the world
around us . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment