wherewithal(L) 1/14/17

How literal is the reference to “wherewithalL”

as if it were the grandness of unity

in where-with-all?

If I infer it,

am I at a distance?

Is wherewithalL only referential

or is it a continuum in me?

In my mind’s eye,

is wherewithalL contextual?

Does wherewithalL ever have depiction?

Is it conceivable

without being an act of distraction?

If it is biblical,

is it like Noah’s Ark,

where divergence is

an expression of oneness?

Is it all quantum

where I have surrendered from Newtonian?

Is it totally thoughtless

but all heart?

Do we have a language there

but without words?

Is there annunciation

but without pronouncement?

Do we have a sense of spirituality

but no concept of religion?

Is there clarity

but without prerogatives?

Is it consummate

but without identification?

Is there song

but no convention towards chorus?

Is there blood as if it were all oceans?

Is there breathing as if we were sky?

Do I know myself

as species or spirit or stardust,

where genuine has no need for proof?

Is it integral

yet quite thoughtless and seamless

and wholly of one soul?

Is wherewithalL ever without location,

completeness or summary?

And is asking this

ever an admission of denial? . . .