consciousness as to content 1/31/17

the difficulty is that we make consciousness evident,

as if by content,

as if that provides a sure grip on something,

which seems so vague if we don’t use content

as the evidence and the descriptive.

consciousness is only dressed up in content,

as if by the style we use

filled with story and identifiables

and the certitude of account.

none of those actually have any direct involvement

with consciousness,

they just appear to.

consciousness is not stream of thought either

although if one were not appeased by communication

as supposedly the means of consciousness,

then what would consciousness be?

that we take on language and meaning

and the apparencies of logic and a sensible life

as if that is consciousness,

most of that is fill and viable surface

for the convenience of appraisal.

we sometimes associate consciousness with intelligence

but that too features representation

as if the defining element of consciousness.

it is as if the assumption is

that consciousness is substantive in nature.

that there is a definite medium of measure

available to it.

it certainly cannot be like

the relationship of particle to wave

where it cannot be definitely identified

as specifically so in the now.

we also like consciousness to have emotional elements

that are involved and evident too.

we want consciousness to have inroads to spirit

and possibly soul type qualities that appear.

all of this is of the convenience of the observer

to objectify as if it was measurable in passing. 

consciousness as if accounted by content,

however that assemblage is composed

does not constitute consciousness.

the symbology used, the language embodiment,

the lifestyle, or the presence

does not yield the full spectrum of consciousness

that is present or in broadcast.

the carriage of that essence as it streams is definite

but not definable.

it is divine but really indescribable.

consciousness is an energetic in broadcast

but not limited to that which we make out as experience. 

conscious is not the sum total of thought either

or the manifestation of feelings

as if direct from source.

consciousness is a greater expanse of being

than summation can provide

and consciousness, as the product of content,

is just wildly false and misleading.

to embrace consciousness is a process of immersion.

by the time it would surface

as agreement or languaged or shared embodiment, 

consciousness has moved beyond

the efforts of claim or acknowledgment.

consciousness if ever the flow and being

is ever the presence of that

without regard to any method of account

as if observed from

as a separate action in an experiential way or means. 

consciousness has no direct relationship to content,

that handle has been a curiosity

but only of interest

not of essence

or of essential means . . .