recognition is all but iconoclastic
to the natural course of things in nature.
because we are quote, ‘the’ species,
we don’t believe ourselves to be the radicals.
we invented stage presence,
agreement is as if our state of mind
but not our presence of being.
we govern nothing but proof.
we don’t learn from nature to comply
but only to control.
there are natural messengers all around us, shouting
but we are senseless to hear their concern or cause,
that is unless it directly affect us in fearful ways.
we are the high contrast species on the planet,
as if this was all staged just for our benefit,
as if nature is our white board for our personal usage.
did someone just drop us all off here on earth
just for the fun of it as in matrix-wise?
is deeper perception just seen as complaining?
do we have it so good as if ignorance is bliss?
to me, recognition is bad technique in our usage.
it is somehow dysfunctional in honoring nature
by its current means and intent.
I surely can recognize many things
but I can’t get any closer to than that.
if I wanted separation,
then recognition would be the real tool
to experience worlds, apart for us . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment