becoming 1/23/18

becoming is the event horizon

as if existence in time actually occurs.

and the phenomenon is rather observance

and not of the presence itself.

ongoingness does not feature itself.

isness has no self audience.

experience, as a technique,

fashions the craft of the close watch,

a self account, the fabric of the story-line,

the unseen functional normative,

into a narrative of the mind scape.

becoming is a viewer enterprise,

a side-bar referential,

made into understanding’s preach.

as if talk ever served a higher purpose

is assumed.

becoming is nothing more than the ever unfolding

as if a linear humankind version is adequate.

we assume a train of thought has to come our way

before we can get on it.

and then we participate as passengers only

circuitously going from an A to a B

as if linear thinking provides any more

than remarks from bystanders

about what is framed as an event.

becoming is all about wardrobe choices,

mirror views reflectively

and a commandeered sense of purpose

in defense of account.

becoming is the event horizon

as we have invented it

in a substitutional way.

we are the isness

but also in conscious denial.

becoming is our locational means

promoting that denial,

but in good stead

anything coming into mass is mystical to us.

our sensory range never lies

but also cannot tell the whole truth

in a first person sort of way.

otherwise there would be no becoming.

instead a wisdom of being

would consciously thrive ongoing.

then time would be the next concept

to dismantle out of our existence.

working on that whittle-down

until we are just, the oneness . . .