the landscapes of the microscopics
the finer the view
the more movement there exists
eventually everything is in motion
until there is nothing at all
but motion in overwhelm
until locating anything
is a burden of viewing style
viewing is a technique
based on separation, time used,
and methods of account
eventually everything
is out of the range of naming
audience perspective is not possible
all the baggage of viewing as a style
is lost along the way
comprehension looses it keptness
mental constructionism
is an outdated technique
if you go to it
the process is that you become of it
and that connection, that immersion
is not experientially translatable
it is to discover that experience
in this light is not a viable technique
being witness is impossible without merit
a falsification of the presence that is there
what is there
functions on a different energy basis
than what and how
we claim as knowledgable
we are both of it
and basically removed from it
it lives us
but we don't live as it
the integrity of livingness
is on a totally different level of energetics
than we, as a consciousness, have access to
we are wildly tangential
and mildly referential, at best
micros and macros are yoga tests
for our minds
we seem to lack the flexibles of the mind
to venture past sensory observation
grok seems to be our outer limit potential
if anyone mind-travels
everyone else is thoroughly in doubt
if one dreams the impossible dream
what language base is there
to report with and from?
time-travel?
let's phenomenalized about that to death
we are basically
a comfort-zone audience species
evolution is a much slower process
with humans
than say with insects
or even other animal species
compared to us in time.
all we got going is racial overtones
micro and macro are
still potential future consents
but for now
with micro and macro,
we are still audience journeys
that tantalize our minds . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment