we haven't got the time-space down 2/9/20

to all of space,

its comprehension of time, 

is just a unified 'now'.

all of its past and future

is completely contained

in that now.

that 'now' is unrealized comprehension

by our means.

we don't understand that comprehension.

we invented understanding

as a means

but the leverage and insight from it,

does not essentially address this issue.

our method of addressing time-space

still contains a false undiscovered premise,

an abstraction of means

that does not exist in the time-space continuum 

in the way we presume it to be.

and that unexplored premise is our perceptual style.

we have it as an objective pursuit, 

when there is no objectivity by our means.

we are also an integral part of the time-space

but have invented a medium 

in which we have time and space 

as separate entities.

yet one is in disguise in the other

or vice versa.

and we can't realize the disguise embedded within.

we call out space

and do not a sense of the time of it.

and we call out time 

and do not feel for the space of it.

our comprehension is all sensory surface

and not real sense-immersion into it.

our language is the style

of all wrapping paper.

we do not know how to unwrap with language

when time-space does not function or cater that way.

we ourselves are the method of enigmas

as the consternational emptiness of answers

and the befuddlement of false immersions.

we entrain towards this preoccupancy 24/7.

how we have experience is substitutional.

where ever we are,

we only take cognitive photos,

to have a memory as a distant refrain.

we falsify the essentialness

into a self-contained version,

a construct of mental equivalency 

and an ever advancing construct as understanding.

reality is only iconic

in its mediumship with time-space.

time-space is not the addressable issue.

more directly, it's how comprehension has displaced us

in our participation in time-space.

we truly are there

but not by comprehensive means.

our entire lives are an aborted effort

of experiential comprehensive means

but the methods we use, strengthen our separateness

by observational pulls and sensory lockdowns

that limit our hows and whys of conscious existence.

time-space is a consciousness

that we cannot demand into experience-realm existence.

we selectively pursue experiential means

to the exclusion of a time-space consciousness,

with an unceasing dedication of an awareness from within

and yet no means of exposure evident.

we think we can abstract isness out of method.

invent all methods,

not realizing the abstraction that that becomes,

to the exclusion of our essential search.

we are all of the leap of intention and draw

but we survive by the meaning-full-ness of our fall.

leap and fall have our time-space version of account

which really don't exist outside our sense of that.

our use of time and space does not give us a unified now

we are in that now

but always, by our means,

experiencing at it as a past

to postulate a future

and neither truly exist in a unified now . . .