what minds do with thoughts

what minds do with thoughts,

ever the weavers

for the tapestries that we live in 

and their presence, there of.

reverie for creations are ever onward

yet not ever leaving an audience perspective.

philosophy is just a better seating arrangement.

say, for example, watching professional basketball.

celebrities want front rows, 

the feel of heated bodies intimately passing close by.

but philosophers of sport want the 7th or 8th row up

because they want eyesight level at the lateral rim height.

sure they can look down on the floor action

but all the glory of discovery is at rim level and above,

for those that go where others can not,

where animation dreams of a further existence,

where spirits enter into the animation of play.

philosophers want feel that translates into verbiage.

a cognitive that has fourth-dimensional access,

magic that becomes majestic, 

out of a somewhat mystical

as truth to be action told, 

beyond comprehension's previous expectational view,

professional sports, a popularized subjectivism 

that gains a sense of common knowledge access,

something we could all come to know.

it's what minds want to do with thoughts,

harvest some sense of an elixir,

a dimension of worth

as if conceived as evolutionary in reach.

it is as if we would all want 

to look into our own eyes,

look beyond the capacity to stare,

to look more deeply, questioning,

to peer into 

what resides behind our looking out,

to see and sense that which is of composition,

that which however drives us

into the pretense of reality

and yet denies us essence access.

maybe it's to see the brain in action,

or how utterance and physical activity is so sponsored,

to see the workings

with better than zoo-like observation,

better than desire being in time has come up with,

better than exposure to being a self, generally generates.

we make major assumptions 

that what minds do with thoughts

is the eternal operative.

at least that we can have in mind, 

as to what we claim as mind.

are we just the work of insulation

seeking further isolation?

philosophy expects that the method of their 'come-by'

works for the astute and the gifted of deep thought,

that notice is an initial introduction

and conjure is an acceptable approach method,

for the future to meet us on our own methods and terms.

maybe thought is shoes instead of wings

and language is not the same as wind

and thermals have lots to say

but we are only listening to the weathering effect.

just saying,

not sure say is the escort provided

that doesn't just drive us around and around.

if we have a vibratory language base

that catered to immersion intelligence,

I could wholeheartedly feel for that,

as if also, thought-worthy.

sure it's a potential leap as thoughts go,

having to leave the comfort of thought registry

as it currently functions.

but hey, I would look forward

to thought elevation,

beyond from what generally results with thought.

if there was some other dimension 

other than containment of and from thought, 

would that be considered philosophically advancing?

I know, I am just saying

as if kite string will never become the kite,

no matter how close a location of string I am.

as I could be really near the kite,

still I am just a tethering of knowingness,

but never in the vortex of being.

the kite is as metaphor representing.

as I, of humanness,

I could easily ask for spare change.

but now, I want transcendence,

even if the sky of me 

is still only asking . . .