if oneness is to become evident,
there is a breakdown,
a breakthrough
and a break out,
to a break free
in a very succinctly implied sense.
they is not a plural of me
and we is not a plural of them.
for there is a positionality inferred
that I am them
but not in a plural sense,
as well as they are me
in my singular.
oneness looses all of its previous referentials.
we are, is in the singular
and they is, we is, me
but my we, is not me
but all of us, indivisibly present.
what makes and keeps us as separates
is only superficially implied and applied
as a preoccupation of the self stance in isolation.
if oneness is to become evident
there is a breakdown,
a breakthrough,
and a break out,
to a break free.
that freedom is oneness realized as being . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment