timelessly becoming 11/4/18

I can’t tell you a ‘what’.

for, in this case,

it doesn’t come across as a ‘think’.

I don’t know of an ‘it’.

figure it this way,

there is immersion, then I am.

my think is naively along for the ride.

I observe that ‘translation’ does not work.

there is nothing directly substantive 

that I can put into words.

how ‘it’ is, 

does not play into experience.

comparative truth could stare at it all day

and get nothing as if in return.

the ‘it’ of it goes on 

only if I am attending.

that is all I can bring back into experience.

my accounting is only accounting

I made of it.

I can say things like whole thought. 

but ‘there’ is a means of placement

from ‘here’ to the concept of ‘there’

and all of that made of a that, ‘there’.

I have it that they both exist

but I can only claim 

that it is simultaneous.

proving it keeps me steadfast ‘here’

and longingly away from ‘there’.

that ‘there’ has no need for time.

if ‘there’ had sensory aware

it would not feed for a self-consciousness.

no ‘now’ occurs ‘there’ as referential.

‘there’, when there, has no space considerations.

for ‘there’ is no there.

our approach of taking understanding

and going ‘there’, 

makes for all of the there that we get,

which does not work.

for understanding is excess baggage

and an idle method in an evolutionary sense.

there is not payoff in return

‘there’ for livingness 

then becomes isness

timelessly, ever becoming isness . . .

so ‘there’,

(why have concerns?)