to go beyond
implies a presence of something anew,
beyond the set-up boundaries of recognition
and for mental retention to account for.
to go beyond
assumes some measure of distance
in proximity,
a context of familiar in comparison to,
as a here-to-there comparative
or a now-to-then.
to go beyond
has a nextness to it,
as if all things of this nature
are to be sequential in exposure.
to go beyond
as if remembering is as if stored,
as a short-term memory
that has correlative elements in play,
some movement of a now
to the immediacy of another newer now.
to go beyond
entails replacement
into this fabric of newness,
the yield of comparative truth in response
yet the maintenance of perspective
and a supply of differences evident.
to go beyond
as full of noticeable features,
a continuum of observation
that has a sensory of worth identifiable
in the way that newness exposes itself.
to go beyond
has none of these principles functioning,
no audience,
no journey,
no baggage,
no travel,
no experience in a comparative manner.
beyond has no mind work involved,
just surrender,
embrace
and immerse.
beyond has no verb of action,
no direction of intention to fulfill.
beyond has no destination,
no place of self as occupancy.
to go beyond
is not significant
as comprehension makes it appear.
there is no action directed towards 'to'.
there is no orientation of 'go'
and 'beyond', as an ego prerogative,
has vanished as self has given way.
to go beyond as a koan,
completes of itself,
was journey-less,
selflessly so . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment