transparency is not the truth either.
it is a contextual response
with logical support reasoning.
there is an assumption of sanity involved.
the verticality of truth,
dependent upon the deepest truth,
is not discovered to be revealed.
it is the strategy of topic revealed
but not the deeper source of the cause.
the reward for transparency is audience satisfaction,
which is not based upon the ultimate truth,
but more so on listening majority approval.
transparency is only a reaction to perceived gloss.
and the gloss is a pushback to relevancy versus privacy.
we do not live in a truth ordained world.
the game of truth has many levels
and many consequences,
dependent upon the apparent circumstances when revealed.
truth rides on a concept of immediate agreement.
experience, when framed as truth to be told,
is not very efficient or effective at forthright representation.
truth is actually a quasi-concept,
highly promoted in a cultural bias sort of way.
but even a group of people at a singular event
come away with varied versions of truth to be told.
yet there is a reliance on what is said as the truth,
when actually it is a 'taken in good faith'
rather than what actually happened ,
down to the essence of the intention and actions involved.
transparency is an affirmative
in response to a correction for an initial given account.
each person's value terrain holds truth in a different light,
by acts, motivations, outcomes, and intent.
transparency ask for latitude and good faith,
truth is hard to handle otherwise . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment