now has no narrative 5/6/20

now has no narrative.

how baffling is that?

and we still want to go there?

with what would we take

and how would we be 

for being there?

neither of those questions apply.

news crews need not bother.

even if they are only an internal sense of oneself.

attempting to experience 

the presence of there as itself

does not provide for the lag-time experience uses.

would we like to claim 

we are there by sensory input?

our senses, long ago or early on,

committed to supporting a cognitive process.

now has no time for that to function.

now also has no audience perspective.

remember that old saying,

about what if all of time was happening as now?

you know, that past, the present and the future

were all happening as now.

this would kind of a mess with memory retention,

and the mechanics of experience

without a timeline to process as cognitions.

nothing referential occurs. 

there is no basis for language usage.

there are no subject-object frames of reference.

in some respect, we couldn't be more poorly trained

to enter into the now.

I mean, yes, we are part of the now,

but we have no real or authentic means 

of being conscious there.

all we have is a sense of self,

both in the now,

but not abled as the now.

we are mired in time-frame existence.

our methods or mechanics don't really apply.

how strange to be 

where we can not experientially fully go.

we will always have perspective

but not whole presence, 

and not quantum in presence.

it is totally awesome

that now has no narrative 

to speak of . . .