The leaving

The leaving of all of us

in a quantum calling

is puzzling,

for as long as ‘we’ are an ‘us’,

we are not together.

Quantum is not entered

by the techniques of descriptive.

Surely quantum has order

but not by the outside ordination

of rules and observation.

There is no abstraction

towards assistance that happens.

Isness, for us, is an initiation.

It is more than a leap of faith

where by we notably leave

all luggage behind.

This, as an isness,

is an organic participation

in the grand barrenness

of the emptiness of trust.

It is where we leave procedures

of construction

and the witness of creation

behind

for the essence of being,

then manifest.

Quantum abides

by leaderless being

and not by evidential doing.

If there are rules,

integrity is the collective manifesto.

Coherence is a spectator term.

Observation is several generations

removed from source

and grandly obtuse to getting there.

The knowledge method

has baggage.

The knowing method

is schizophrenic

and there is an issue within

of self as self-conscious corruption.

Discovery is a false claim

and subsequently a diversion.

Any of the techniques

of phenomenology

are respectable

but abusive frauds

towards the original cause.

If quantum were to happen,

it would leave your lips,

your mind

as essence in isolation.

Anywhere you would take

your awareness

would make consciousness

a form of reductionism

to get back to here.

To go is to not come back.

If you did come back

in some manner,

you would be a fractal

of yourself and humorously

beyond joyless joy.

You could make

your body represent you.

It would just be,

for those around,

a least interesting

and least attractive part of you.

And for the rest

of the quantum you,

we would all want to swim there

until we are the water of it

and not the want of it happening.

And we would thank you then,

for you being

the quantum of you . . .