‘gun’ is an impediment of the mind.
to observe and decode ‘gun’
in an emotional mind-talk way
is the conclusions reached
after a contentious inner self-dialogue.
one done without regard to social etiquette
but with authentic, irrational, emotional presence.
it is composed of a war-room account
of all the perceived injustices
one could enunciate as if to tolerate.
none that have been aligned by their weight.
most, if not all,
still are in an allegiance to hurtful cause,
that of self-induced pain
but perceived as the result of others’ actions.
no matter the reality context in an original fashion,
all is kept and stored in this place of cumulative pain
that is not really rational,
and not clearly retained.
now it is a powder-keg of kept-ripe reactive source.
all the stored energy of self, seen as denied
or disrespected or outright abused
is kept here as it own room of concealed rage.
not necessarily as act out rage
but more so initially as seething and get-even rage.
opportunity is always looking
for next outbreak of anger.
possibly minor in its origin,
but having potential to either be stored
or to trigger.
and what that trigger does is this:
it opens the inner dialogue of ‘gun’
and ‘gun’ is code for payback.
not just payback, payback,
but end it all payback,
or factor-ten payback,
or I’ll get your attention
beyond your disregard of me
and you will never forget it! (payback)
‘gun’ is not the tool to start with.
way before ‘gun’ is the state of mind
as the inner dialogue rages on quite privately.
‘gun’ is code for the means for getting even.
not just for the act perceived
but for the all of time experience accumulated,
as they all fall into this one pain.
a pain, no words spoken seem to be able to resolve.
but put into action
and ‘gun’ now becomes an act-out mechanism.
a means to say beyond what words could say or do.
‘gun’ is to-die-for, in principle,
one way or the other, or both.
it is a leap of dire internal faith.
a faith the is from isolation
and a sense of self as loss or lost.
‘gun’ is an emotional and psychological code word.
it represents the deep and the dark and the definite
in that reactive light.
however hair-brain impulsive
or calculated towards premeditated thought,
‘gun' is a mood of conclusion,
whatever the reality of resolve.
getting rid of guns falsely addresses the issue.
it makes it a post-problem based upon results
as damage and death and destruction of human life.
but the real source is buried deep within the culture.
the internal chemistry for ‘gun’
is from the isolation of self
from the humanity of others.
and as a whole,
that language,
the language of the ‘gun’ world,
does not work to support connectivity,
that culture is so derisive in the pursuit of self.
and that success is constructed at the loss for others
as if success is a composition that all humans play
in such a way that if you win you have audience
and if you loose, you are audience in resolve.
hurt is a given as a side effect of the play.
‘gun’ is an alien force directed by isolated people.
their emotional and psychological makeup is inborn within it.
we all are well versed in it.
the deep meaning of ‘gun’ goes unspoken,
even to the heart of the matter.
having guns or not is a diversion
away from the issue of essence.
it is a charade of the mind
parading as deep-seated emotional issues
that have no other address.
‘gun’ is an index that addresses the failure of culture,
the disparity of humanity
and the disease that seems to have no cure.
as long as there is duality in the mind
as method and then positions taken,
‘gun’ is a pawn in that game.
as long as we have worth as a medium,
‘gun' should not be a game changer
or a means of falsely perceived equalization or payback.
cursing is real.
even mad-at and anger are very real.
but ‘gun’ is a game changer,
even though it may appear
that the unspoken dialogue has ended
with ‘gun’ as punctuation,
there is still a glitch in the human program
and our proof-reading is not to the depth
to include soul . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment