seriously, acquisition is not immersion 6/12/18

acquisition is not immersion

please allow me to explain 

so if you have acquired 

then you’d only have gained a sense of control

but still working under an unsaid assumption

that initially you were separate from that it to start

in order for the experience of gaining control

so if you had that power of control,

then one of the tenets of that power

is that you have the original self experience 

of being separate from it

but then you gained the self-adulation of control over it

so part of the benefit of that control

is that you had to have an audience,

either objects or people

who are in receivership of being controlled 

and are in response to being controlled

as possessions or service to your beck and call.

so if you controlled everything

that does not mean that in any method you applied

you have come into immersion

or any sense of oneness 

with these controlled people or things

then you’ve just continued to orchestrated a universe 

that demonstrates the premise of separatism 

at its most supreme state

therefore to you,

you have the power over all of these people or things.

so to backtrack in more detail,

so the use of the concept of supply and demand

is dependent the premise of need

and need is dependent upon the premise 

that you lack what you want

and your lack is dependent upon the premise of separatism 

in that you either have or don’t have

and that’s dependent upon 

a method of insular self-identification

where everything is objectified 

as objects of or for your usage

in the supply and demand account of living.

so if usage is dependent upon this theory

and this theory is dependent upon your think

and your think is dependent upon 

this particular style of insulation, isolation and separation 

as a means of self in identification

and within this personal sense of identification, 

there is the method of experiential distinction

and experience is totally dependent upon 

that kind of referencing

in order to identify all of everything

and the nature of identification is dependent upon

separation from it in order to identify it  

then the whole the nature of experience 

is a form of addiction 

that does not get you immersion

but only gets you acquisition by understanding

so the fundamental challenges are

to not use the brain 

in this computer-like coveting format 

but to use the brain into a quantum existence 

and part of that quantum existence 

is that you have immersion in it

and there is an integrity in this immersion

rather than a rational integrity 

to the logic of understanding.

so the most difficult self experiment 

is not education, discipline or success

the most difficult self experiment is 

how to channel the quantum existence 

of yourself into oneness

and if so, 

then life is not viewed as referential

and experience is 

only a trivial method of participation.

so then metaphorically,

experience is like the surface of the ocean 

and quantum is the embodiment of that ocean

and our sense of logic would only be 

an attempt to put shoelaces on winged feet.

and more so, in the experience of our minds,

beta brainwaves are like still-shots taken

generating alpha reality-movies

but these alpha movies 

do not generate theta holograms.

and the major element of reasoning for that 

is that alpha and beta states use a through-time-element 

as part of their essential development and presentation

to our normalized time-bound consciousness.

but theta does not essentially exist functionally in time

as its process 

to generate the hologram of immersion.

so rather than the mind-movie for audience experience

where by the audience is not in the state of immersion

either by experience or account

theta brain-state provides the opportunity

for immersion

atrophying the use of experience and audience

and subsequently the need to control

as well as the resulting 

separatism, ownership and possession.

all of which has become the entrapment of

our current nature of experience

and how we negotiate the land of self-consciousness.

then the primary discovery is

that we want immersion

but sadly, we settle for acquisition

and the circus that audience provides as living . . .