how conclusions dishearten as method
(a verbal weeping on my part)
positive thoughts are held at gunpoint
by pending negative thoughts.
the stage is set for the impending preoccupation
with the historic good versus evil.
only it is taking place internally
as a practice to develop a moral perspective,
as a governing body of internal awareness
on these specific terms of personal ethics.
no one sees the deeper projection
that leads to this working premise
as guidelines for living.
no one questions the driving forces
behind good versus evil paradigm.
the assumption of its bottom-line relevance is masterful.
consensus reality is a constant voting
for the pursuit of this perspective
as good versus bad or right versus wrong.
it creates a constant self absorption in personal integrity
based on a somewhat agreement
as to what is acceptable behavior
by some internal method of observation and account.
of course, as life is lived,
this does become a projection
maintained for external observation by others
but the inner workings of this model
have long discovered the absurdity, the paradoxes,
the anomalies, the self-pretends,
the fixes and the binds that,
if done well, can virtually go undetected by others
and therefore one can pass
as normalized by others’ standards.
you can be unique.
you can be individualistic, far out,
somewhat strange but not threatening,
or a danger or a full-on menace to the presence of others.
these rules are relaxed in the privacy of one’s own person
when the act out is not seen or heard
or promoted to or by others.
yet groups can participate is such behavior
under the warrants of claimed
or declared circumstances such as outright war,
economic success at the expense of others
or the use of planet
or those who cannot speak up for themselves.
otherwise there is a rhythm to order
and a civility in a socialized sense.
and in that regard, positive thoughts are seen
as a working premise as if ‘versus’ is a given
and outcome has to eventually appear that way.
it surely is a hoax if deeply thought out.
but then all of societies by agreement,
deny participating is such a hoax.
yet the planet suffers profoundly
but is substantially ignored.
many humans, either by race or religions
or governmental control suffer broadly and grossly
under the pretends offered
as the positives-versus-negatives perspective of relevance.
deeper insight may not be revenue-producing
in significant ways
and thereby our species-elitism maintains
its status of indifference to the actual value
of this false premise
as ways and means
for human advancement or development.
dualistic thinking of this kind is the grand assumption
and capitalism has figured out how to profit
from both sides of the street on this.
war is capitalism at its best.
we need common enemies
that we all can experience
across the board as fear
and as sense of productive means
to further involve ourselves in that premise.
war is a few powerful people
working out their personal struggles with self
in grand scales that others are falsely enrolled in
by some means of honor, loyalty, patriotism
or revenge for previous acts already occurred.
there seems to be human status to the rituals
involving victory and defeat
even though this whole act out is a farce
of human understanding the deeper-truths
of human existence on a planet in a cooperative ways.
There is so much momentum
to this false line of reasoning and existence
but the investments and the further act-outs
keep this falsity of fire burning
and the vengefulness seems endless.
there is no language agreed upon
that comprehends or embraces the falsity
of these lifestyles that further promotes this.
even if the poles reversed themselves,
the planet somehow resorted
to alternate directions of spin or wobble,
or devastations beyond political boundaries
could bring us into shared realizations
about what symbiotic cooperatives means
might look and functions like.
we really don’t understand the cooperatives
of the planet itself
for the purposes of alignment from our species
and its reverence for that ongoing process.
the only motivation to participate
is to control
as if this is all a game-board
laid out for humans to stage upon
and that is its ultimate relevance
from our ongoing ways and means participation.
it is hard in the myopia of human concerns
to grasp the bigger picture
than what is feed to us
via media and political promoted concerns.
hard to realize, as a single person
what is our relationship with the planet
beyond our daily rituals of self and survival.
under the guise of productivity,
we brutalize the planet as the environment
to serve our assumption of needs
in advancing from previous assumptions
that have been discovered to be in effective
or absolutely absurd
but that was then and now is how.
we are ever so subtly a menace to ourselves
and use the planet as out staging arena.
in discussion, any topic is too small
or too vast to personalize
towards a personal relationship with the planet
in a recovery sense.
at best, it may look like eat organic,
drive safely, pay taxes, drink bottled water,
and act out one’s personal frustrations
in the privacy of their own person.
we appear to be remote
even as individuals contemplate the actualities
of all of this for themselves.
where does one person end
and another begin
when we are in concert with the planet
and its native functionality
that we might come to align with?
at this point, it seems the next real break will come
when we have robots do all the work
and we then take the individual time
to personally study how we relate
to the basic mechanics of the earth
as it functions
without our devastating influence impending.
maybe this is all a lament of observation
at the illusiveness of essential cause
and all of the obviousness of human failure in this regard
as evident.
emotionally, none of this is okay
even though it is hard to wrap a mind-grip on the all
and awe of it.
for me, this all starts with deeper inroads
into human consciousness.
from there, one can deal with what is in their face
on a daily basis
and withdraw by atrophy
from blatant acts of unconsciousness
to both the planet and to the species
most relevant around us
and work, moment by moment,
at realization and restore in relational manners,
even if for us,
that comes to mean garden rather than lawn,
more time face to face with ourselves, others
and the obvious species that surround us daily.
being conscious is not being in conclusions
but more so aware, compellingly aware.
earth experience is not television,
probably not spectatorship,
a need for more community collaboratives,
less definitions based upon self as separateness
and finding causes
that dance our existence
into spirit-awake
as soul of consciousness, alive . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment