The universality of brainworks; part one

Part one

What works the brain

the way the brain works?

If self-consciousness

is the baggage

in the evolutionary process,

how do we travel light?

The use of our self-consciousness

is as the essential driver

for a deepening of consciousness.

Two themes seem forthcoming:

One, the use of the referential world

as a workout gymnasium

for operative brain functioning,

as in the advancement of habit

by conscious repetition.

Two, the method

of our referential-ness

is as a form of objectification

which focuses on the differences

as opposed to an empathetic system

which immerses in the parallels

towards tangential connections and

bonding confluence.

Which method reaches deeper

into being as a basis

of consciousness expansion?

It seems that in the grosser world,

opposites attract,

while in a subtler world,

like attracts like.

Historically,

the simpler the symbology,

the less deeper the imprint

and integration in the brain.

The more complex and varied

the outside stimulus,

the deeper the brain complexity

in development

and therefore the greater the quantum

of consciousness possible.

Initially, it may look like

polarization versus harmonics.

These are really dissimilar

rather than opposites.

We are highly trained

in polarization reality

while we yearn deeply

for and towards harmonics.

Is this a circumstance

of methods versus

real essential differences

based on energetic priorities?

Even our thought styles

based on education and knowledge

seem to capture us

into referential idleness.

We explore the same continuums

and advance within them

but it is rare for us

to transcend that plateau.

New vision may seek the status

of solution as its means.

Is any problem ever solved

outside of the containment

of assumptions

that it is proposed from?

As opposed to the issue

of it being problematic

in its origin,

is it ever released

by those who held it

on this basis

from their frame of reference,

which is always less

than the wholeness

of the enlightened circumstance

in which it is not being addressed?

To me, empathic visioning

is a livingness

and not our traditional

thinking process.