I would like words
to stand up
with what meaning can do
for any mind,
to activate and reveal
those inner electrical
contortionisms . . .
What is that brain flurry
set off by words?
Words . . . upon hearing
or directly thought,
and then there in the mind,
in some nanosecond registry
and onto response.
Right there,
before utterance in return,
possibly before verbal assembly,
there is the exercise
of discreet unseen
operational rules,
before conversing emerges.
With words,
it is so passé within the brain,
even before
understanding’s salivation.
Sure there is this loiter
of topic within us,
some things we all hold
as always in plain view.
But also
there are all these other
embellishing aspects.
To take word delivery
and input the fanfare of speech
for how is something
that is so automatic
but also so veiled
by concealing methods of beyond
or beneath or behind.
What we have agreed to
is obscured beyond belief.
In that we agree to agree,
there is no challenge to it in practice.
Understanding may bring forth
a challenge to meaning as shared.
I would like words
but I want conveyance
out of conversation.
Maybe speaking in tongues
is all I am asking.
I want confluence as a stream,
by what a person is saying
into a hologram of shared presence
for there and then.
I want no more description
and less understanding
as an end repose.
I want more internal raptness
from what is externally said.
This is not to get agreement
to agree with what words said.
This is be there
and empathetically tone-blend
within it back.
It is not asking for collusion
but more so collectively concurrent.
Words are capable droplets,
working towards
a co-shared fluid state.
Always a yes with words,
as a fountaining,
wet with what sound bestows,
towards a torrential rain
with the senses submerging
towards one pooling,
with no additions
from a linear sense
just pooling,
as it continues towards
humanity as ocean.
I would like words.
I do not want to settle for
cups or bowls or bottles full.
I want amphibious-like empathy
instead of self-consciousness.
I want the oxygen and hydrogen gods
of our chemical watery makeup
to tell the story,
yet within words
but for us
to not settle for wordiness,
to not reside
in the residue of meaning
as if it is of a substance
like a self-imposed
limiting metaphor,
or the impotence of understanding
based on the meaning of words.
I would like words . . . then.
No comments:
Post a Comment