experience is only method

 

if space is traveling 

faster than the speed of light,

than space can't be measured by time,

because space is than 

outside of the 'now' continuum. 

space, as a paradigm of time usage,

has limited usage,

as the experience of space-time

is in-debt-ed to a fallacy, 

as if knowing can comprehend only in movement

but not in conclusionary stasis. 

therefore the static-ness of languaging 

falsifies the true nature of existence

for the sake of our perceptual style.  

its essential intentional failure

is the promoting fixedness as understanding.

where future is in a language of all verbs,

as everything is a constancy of motion.

fluid comprehension is different 

than static traditional understanding,

where our comprehension is 

a fixedness of still-shot-focus on motion

yet in the constancy of the ever-change,

which is beyond our method 

of memory as still-shot retention.

we need more retention of a method

other than our attention on image-memory. 

our primary brain usage 

cannot be assigned to a status of fixedness.

but more so, 

onto an ongoingness  

as immersive into fluidness, 

not wanting for, 

the static-ness of thought as retention,

but for the isness of conscious immersion.

for the way we have mindfulness,

is to travel apparently forward,

with a prominent amounts 

of memory-retention baggage

on a experiential life-journey 

as if in a vain of existence as ongoing travel,

with a sense of ongoing add-on retention, 

as if experiential memories in return.

yet our evolution has a 'now' as full bore.

mental labor, attending to the past,

is not an integrity dedicated to isness

by falsely manifesting 

as a pseudo currency of now.

the justification for all of our techniques,

falsely honors the past,

by mind-techniques that are rooted, 

almost unconsciously,

yet function as productive, 

towards futurized account,

when our use of conscious memory 

is a falsehood of futurizing the now.

with our prominent mind-techniques 

that only gives experiential approximation

primarily based on skills and expectations 

gleaned from memory of the past,

as we keep repeating technique failures

as the fundamental basis of our approach. 

for us to advance,

the nature of experience has to radically evolve,

otherwise experience is complete evolutionary sabotage,

in which we are time-based 

and static noun-bound.

and we in all of our consciousness,

cannot leave the experiential witness bleachers

for complete presence in the isness field.

we are radiance filled,

before we are rationally preoccupied.

and yet, 

we can't seem to escape the experience barrier,

for the way we have conceived of its usage . . .