I don’t mean to be confused
but I have nothing to work with, left.
all my working means are invalid in their usage.
so maybe this is a question:
if I am to ‘not know’ and yet fully arise,
but there will be no recognition or further account,
will clarity not have any need for explanatory means
and ‘know’ would not be fiduciary, as in trust,
and while depiction then be nonexistent
both as an addressor means or by perceptible claims
and also, there would be a profound absence
of contrast and compare?
nothing then existential has parameters in use
yet there is no abandonment involved.
immersed is in the unknowably profound.
understanding has no language basis or conclusions.
all is and there is no observable doing.
and there is no affirmation of self, conceived.
think does not succumb to the existence of thought,
for the construction of think would have no derivatives.
and think then has no personage,
and no conceptual account.
No comments:
Post a Comment