When I would say this to people
that “experience is overrated”,
they would compute and respond
with questions or indignant quips.
“How can you” types of questions
or “you can’t actually say that
for without” . . . types of retorts.
I know there is a discussion brewing
inside their heads.
I can feel the buzz building.
Yes, what I said is/was dismissible,
upon further review, theirs and mine.
What I should have said was,
“there is a major difference between
in-take experience
and out-put experience”.
Okay, you say, explain that one.
For me, in-take experience
is generally eventful
and depicted symbolically as such.
Our highly trained senses work overtime
to take in all that is going on around us
in a sensible (pun intended) fashion.
While our out-put experience
is more ambient
within levels of complexity.
It is accomplished primarily
by presence through consciousness.
Some people have major projective skills
just by their very presence,
as if they are actors of sorts
even before their behavior
provides the everyday evidence.
What I have struggled to make clear
is to say, that I am bored with peoples’
in-take experience, mine included,
and truly fascinated and intrigued
with their out-put experience.
Okay, I know
where you are going with this.
You want to say that their out-put
is still my in-take,
so what is the difference?
The difference for me is
that I am profoundly interested
in their out-put experience, so much so,
that my in-take experience
is basically empathetic rather than evidential.
The skills to develop are like saying
that their out-put experience,
at this level is emotionally based
and my in-take level is
empathetically based.
I am focusing on their out-put
as my in-take experience
which is subtler
and less rationally conscious
as habitually directed
but more energetically truthful
about their being and their spirit.
That type of in-take experience
for me is less documentable
or even evidential
but more energetically rich for me
as an experience style.
In that way, I would have to say
that experience is both underrated
and overrated dependent upon
which method is most operative.
No comments:
Post a Comment