is the trickle down of the oneness mindset
as a human possibility of comprehension possible,
as in non-locality versus myopic optics?
experience, as we know it,
is sensory deprivational,
for the sake of the leverage of cognition
and the eventual production of languaging
as authentic realism’s account, at its best.
objectivity will suffer from its shortcomings.
the philosophies of ‘self’ as we know it
will atrophy from its limited usage as ongoing.
language, in its isolationist and entitlement methods
will also be lessoned for application and need for usage.
thought, as a byproduct of think,
will be radically altered
assuming the use of retentive mind
still has a useful stature in brain-usage ways.
communication will feature coalescence initiative
rather than a distinction prerogative.
conveyance will have a prominence in play
because of the shift in physics applied
as a creative collective emerges.
even experience, as a retention, will be less observed
as experience is an expression of inwardness
that becomes commonly shared
within the commune with other species and spirits.
access to world-view will become common place.
mood will be collectively enhanced ongoing.
emotional mediums of presence and exchange
will be a constancy of solicitation,
as aura to aura, energy to energy, being to being.
oneness will be evidential
but not so much experiential
in the way we are familiarity, mind-wise.
no more billboards or flat screens of inner awareness.
the illusion of time will be discussed
as if it was a practical joke of human participation.
and space will not be a body-burden of restraint.
intention will be travel and awareness then in presence.
this world of oneness already exists
but we are a surrender-away
from the integrity of conscious participation . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment