As an experience,
intensity and intimacy
are confluently linked.
They have common interfaces
of sensory experience
and share co-creation,
one accompanying the other.
In defining the sense of one,
the other may substantially appear
as a means of occurrence.
Both use focusing as a primary.
Intensity is crank up the motor,
intimacy is crank up the awareness.
This intensity amping
then has a need
for intimacy precision to execute
while intimacy closeness has a need
for intense mindful care.
A self-sense executes both
as the mindfulness of precision
and the carefulness with precision
can both be supportive towards
release points
for a person to directly account
for their experience.
Confusing one for the other,
in those sensory moments happens
since they are not
mutually exclusive
from one another.
Intention is to both
an introduction for either
of them to initially occur.
Focus also is a necessary element
even if serving
in slightly different ways for both.
Intensity is a rush, a flooding,
a blast that alters
the previous environment radically
while intimacy is an immersion,
an envelopment, an encampment
that amends the previous setting.
In the mind-fill of experience itself
either of these substitute
for what was previous
and therefore deemed themselves
as the chosen fix
or the sensible cure
for the moving next moments onward.
Catching an edge of discernment
as applied to either directly
will always include
some involvement from the other.
There is no versus to this mix.
Intensity acquiesces to intimacy
and intimacy succumbs to intensity.
It’s a vice versa not a versus . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment