Most often,
all principles
of the process of thought
will be revisited
for further inclusion or integration
in a refinement way
as the evolution
of consciousness unfolds.
This then begs the question
of thought as inherently
the structure of consciousness,
as in; whatever the mind observes,
it is also part of that process
and that thought as structure
limits receptivity
for the favor
of monitoring the frame.
This further oppresses
the notion of receptivity
as a situation of more choices
from a conventional
thought-form array.
It is as if choice
is the false capture of cause
by its nature of immediacy
and the proximity to its claim.
Here in lies a lack
of enlightened modeling
which is the introduction
of the problematic frame
as it seeks solutions
with short timelines
and evidential results.
This situation reinforces compliance
towards the nature of solution
as agreement rather than
true modification or transformation
from within the workings
of thought itself.
If movement and thought
were promoted as simultaneous
and co-supportive
if not shared-essential,
then there would be an increase
in holographic usage in
and as brain; the activity.
Is reality a dimensional fallout
from a consummate state in unification?
Is reality like a set of training wheels
until we, as a oneness,
get up to a type
of vibrational thought-form
resonant speed?
Are brain activities
like creating order
rather than realizing order?
Isn’t this training us away
from optimal thought form
presence residence?
No comments:
Post a Comment