All of thought
is concessionary
towards conclusions.
It is the nature of method itself
to appear to be repetitious
as repeatable patterning
beneath dissimilar
yet apparent conclusive results.
Thought features
a kind of singularity
in focus as focus,
which yields an exaggeration
of particulars in a foreground style,
a genuine myopia as accepted frame.
To this end,
thought is in the style
of being inflationary
as embellishment of nominality
is a primary task.
Yet how many layers
of deep understanding are there
behind dissimilars?
behind contradiction?
behind paradox?
behind continuum?
behind linear as process?
And yet nothing of evidence
is essentially representational.
All of the mentionables are unified
by referential self-consciousness
where thought
as receptive method
is confiscative:
that is, it is brought to thought;
thought does not go to it
for that would be
consensual construed
as subjective in nature,
and an insanity in manner.
No comments:
Post a Comment