paradox is my witness

the wisdom within paradox

offers the inferences of a beyond.

a realization that paradox presents

the predicament of a mind-style usage,

an either-or situation,

in which the historical seduction was

to arrive at a sightedness,

to be coerced into a position, 

of rendering a concluded-ness 

as if a choice made was the inevitable.

but the deep study of paradox

reveals that what presented, is only situational,

relative to mind usage.

deep thought would make it evident

that there was a framing intended,

an allure to perspectives used,

a slight of mind suggested to seduce,

as if the framing is believed to be relevant.

then the paradox is a situational force

in linear thinking style. 

choice becomes the fork in the road.

yet the wind has no relevance for the fork,

neither does the sky or all other creatures.

only the mind of mankind honors it.

even if one knew of both outcomes 

profoundly beforehand,

the baited-ness still secures the victimhood of choice.

the profound belief in intendedness as means.

as the punctuation of choice

throughout one's ongoing life as its means.

fate, luck, coincidence and destiny aside,

paradox presented can also come to reveal

the servitude of mind-styles used as presenting

to be cursed with the belief in sidedness,

to be imprisoned in a self status

that fully enforces and engenders, 

as this linear thinking's life account.

so when a paradox occurs,

as a fork in the road,

begin to study the nature of road,

the countryside of apparent composition,

the false intendedness of appearances,

and the mental construct as if to be believed.

paradox when efficiently perceived

presents beyond what that mind style offers.

what if linear thinking was just a method?

what if belief was made to falsify,

if the premise intended 

needs to be deeply challenged?

every nanosecond is deeply paradox filled

from the mind-style we use to encounter. 

we give status to choice.

we honor with decision.

we then harvest for the narrative forthcoming.

paradox, as witness, offers an in-depth view,

the discovery of projections made realistic

as the surveillance of other's sensory range.

how much contrivance goes into appearances,

or the manipulation of the sensory intake,

or the framing that seduces one into choice?

a human's drivenness is based on choice

but paradox offers a deeper sense of insight.

one has to challenge 

even one's own thought process,

not for the contents, 

but more so the techniques one mindfully uses.

for every working premise

rests on assumptions going in.

a start place of assumptions is the launch location

to witness that with a clarity

that even questions the framing, 

the naming and the claiming

before linear thinking is to proceed.

linear has become the new naive.

if one accepts the train of thought offered,

than one is traveling in a foreign land

where passage has already been fully assigned

and one is merely a passenger along for the ride.

surveillance capitalism is a prime example of this 

as in the more they know how you think,

the more than your think is along for their ride,

the more that issues are presented in their terms,

the more that options are deduced to designated choice.

paradox demands a deeper insight to become relevant.

paradox wants to incite to source a deeper truth

as an ongoing beyond the confinement of apparent method,

as for more of the core and less of the corruption.

paradox is a blessedness appealing.

but one has to listen in 

before they listen up.

everything evident has unspoken intentionals.

the hurl has a source while it also makes a splash.

it's like saying,

the window as evidence is broken glass.

but search for the stone of the action,

put it in the hand of a deeper mind 

and feel for the body heat of the throwers,

sense the intentions that launched said stone.

paradox wants what in-depth has to offer you.

you do have a brain

and the self-discovery is

that paradox will tell you,

that it the self of you,

has a mind of its own . . .