Tone will give more of the informational psychoacoustics of
the field presence as valued evidence than the verbiage does. It is more
important to place oneself in the vibrational field of the harmonics than to be
a spotlighted item of lip service identified. Immersion is more revealing than
identification as it is executed in the mind these days. What you say based
upon your title is less important than where you hurl from within your person
your conviction put into words. Identification services the past by the use of
the retentive mind as its principal means where as immersion features the
currency of now across the whole body field environment of the harmonics
present for then. To field-say is to provide an environmental frame for others
to bring themselves into that immersion full-person empathically. The ideal is
the production of no audience but all playing in the oneness. Language, as
strictly the spoken word, then becomes a fallback position of historical
consequence. The now then takes up holographic excitations as next moment’s
focus from the collective in service to and through the collective itself as a
oneness enterprise. As the field of the collective builds into a oneness
expression, the cutting edge lessens the event-frame though it is not perceived
directly by those not oriented to be in receivership. At the subtlest levels,
up into thought-forms, emotive states, and onto molecules and then the states
of mind into behaviors, tone as the advance, is a metamorphosis provider and
not just a change of plans or redirection of aims. Tone is as the lost art of
speaking in tongues may have been. Tone gives us space and field while the
speak gives us details and particulars . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment