thought is not think part 2 * 12/9/12

Following words

back to their think-source

won’t get us anywhere close.

That is like smelling a soup broth

and coming up with more words

but not the soup itself!

There are other means

for exploration available.

Intuition seems to be

much closer to think

but it tends to function

like a flash camera

or vision by lightning.

Yes, intuition puts out

but we, in thought spectatorship,

are not really well prepared

for the irregularity of it

when it comes through.

And it does give out

a slightly different kind

of information to boot.

Intuition will jump

paragraphs ahead

of the current reality drama,

and say stuff

which seems out

of rationally confined context.

Still, it is closer to think

in origin than thought.

Even further out there

is self channeling,

where you sort of say

without the benefit

of censorship,

what you don’t

comfortably know.

Like it is whispered to you

or through you

and you say it out loud

to someone else.

Remember, no self-censorship,

no editing to an audience fit.

You just blurt it out there

and others will think it’s you.

That gets you closer to think

without the verbal guardianship

of proper or appropriate.

This gets us to another way

of searching for think

and that is to study

self in internal censorship.

All of those imposed rules

before speech

can be safely uttered.

What are they for

and where to they come from

and what do they do to think

before it gets to speech

and maybe even

before it gets to words?