There are so many labels
in a relational world.
We are knowing them
mostly from the outside in.
As with most everything
that includes myself,
there are constant senses
for reference at my side.
There is a verbal mentor
within me
assisted by a kibitzer,
and also a chorus
of inner voices
with their perspectives
and opinions.
All seem to function
as stand alones
but intimately so.
It is an involuntary entourage
maybe as keepsakes.
At first, is-ness and such-ness
were just distant introductions.
Mind you, at an inner distance
but not more than concepts.
They are a curious find
and initially,
somewhat strange
to follow along,
yet not unlike
the initial concept
of understanding a mirror.
That there is . . .
and then there is me,
with a closeness
yet still foreign.
Eventually
there is gross evidence
of the sameness
for my sense and my self.
This is all somehow elusive
and yet very non-demanding.
All efforts and pursuit
were my interests.
Sometimes
it is like “hide and seek”.
Many times,
it is startlingly timeless.
I had a working concept
and revisited with it
into refinement.
Now questions
the mental chauffer.
Does not experience
pass itself off
as the journey?
Always experience
is attempting to be
in the same breath as me.
But isness and suchness
works with tools
that need no tending.
They work with tools
more profound than animation.
They are always more subtle
than I am sensory aware.
Ground/figure
is a very local application.
Subject/object
is really a hobby
done out of habit.
With isness and suchness,
I am saying goodbye
No comments:
Post a Comment