that cannot be experienced.
In fact maybe ‘leap’
is not the right term.
Leap may have expectations,
maybe even visualizations
and some notion of form and manner.
This leap may have
a conventional start place
like the thought or an intention
and some conjure of motivation
followed by some sense
of movement necessary.
But no, this leap,
although apparently recordable
in time
is really timeless.
No I am not saying
it did not happen
but it is not easily experienced.
This is a leap
of nothing in particular
possibly a transcendence of a leap.
This is a leap of indefinable means,
a leap without obvious trappings
of circumstance
and anticipated outcome.
It is not a leap
from one place to another.
It is the transcendence of leap
as leap-ness.
It is a leap so profound,
that you leap
and you leave your senses
for their history,
leaving your mind
for its technical guidance,
possibly even leaving your body
for its act.
It can never be only attempted.
It has no origin or predecessor.
It does not exist
in a comparative manner.
It just is.
Even the basic bulwark
of all of prior experience
by this leap,
is exposed as falsely adequate.
So . . . what I am saying,
I cannot say.
What you are hearing me say,
you can only hear
as yourself saying
what you cannot hear
but can know.
You know you even knew
before you came to know.
And that your knowing
fails to take you there
because there is a you
who is already there,
even before . . .
“the leap” to there.
Once you leap,
you can’t agree or disagree.
There are no more bleachers,
no more understandings,
and no more means,
just this leap of no means . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment