traveling 8/9/17

if memory is just luggage

and decals are high points

or the imprint of principles polarized

then how did travel get to be so locational?

what is the value of smallness in the big picture?

and how did picture ever become a reality context?

if we generated a computer

that could answer that question

would we have generated a new aliveness

for the computer

or have just come

to live with the notion of an answer?

if that is so, then is every answer, its own aliveness,

but we are only audience to its play?

and how did audience become such a lesser state?

or is audience only a method of false alignment

that we have heavily enrolled as consciousness?

is audience just gran(d)ular and not truly molecular?

is depiction then a pseudo method of inquiry?

is then inquiry a false notion of separatism implored?

can ‘know’ have essential worth independently?

if ‘know’ only rides shotgun

can it take us where we want to go?

or are we already there

but without conscious means?

how fitful is the rhapsody of inquiry

that travels the universe

when labored with the use of this luggage? . . .