Is nondualism antirealism?
Isn’t reality as we realize it,
applied fictionalism?
Is Machiavellian countryside,
really the homeland?
If thinking does not generate conclusions,
is the think process
too immersive or incomplete?
What if original think was not a journey
in concepts or language or logical means?
Does original think take on
some immersive sensory means,
then to extract and convert back
into concepts, language and logical means?
Doesn’t how ‘what thinking is’,
use a frenetic bloodline means
to generate topically
what resultively appears as thought?
How rigorous does think have to occur
to not be captured as thought?
Is think initially an empty state
yet coming to be measured by
a content means?
If we consciously channeled ourselves
would content be the ruddership?
Would empty minds relating
use language as its means?
Do soulmates actually have a relationship
as if separatism
realized out of union?
Is a rigorous esthetic
a front row seat of observation
and then an intensity of reflection?
Hey, I’m just looking out there
and questioning the reality ponderosa
I see . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment