Starts
with the nature of frame, holding constant
towards
continuous recognition.
It is
reasonable, logical, sensible
accountable,
justifiable, understandable.
All
these are major contributors
to the
nature of frame.
Even
storyline, what you do,
and the
methods of doing,
all
support the usage of frame.
The
frame even has an economy
called
reductionism or simplification
or
objectification, or cause and effect,
all
working towards frame.
The
presentation of a symbolic world
yields
towards frame.
Literacy
demands frame, assumes frame,
is
dependent on frame.
Time,
for all of its pseudo motion,
is
fundamentally the representation of frame.
So much
of the out there stuff for us
is in
frame.
So much
so
that we
cannot relate to the rest
unless
it is brought into frame.
It has
to be brought to us,
brought
to our prison,
our
personalized cell,
placed
on our sensorial tray, as framed.
It isn't
that it is,
because
it is framed.
It isn't
that we are
because
we pursue it in frame.
It's the
nature of frame
as we
are the process generative to frame.
Our
essence as is-ness
is not
to be as a known-ness.
Our
preoccupation with frame
keeps us
circumventive to what is
and as
it is.
So the
deeper we go into is-ness
without
frame,
the more
essence exudes unnoticed.
Therefore
the identification of frame break
is
initially a contrast
or in
contradiction to frame,
yet very
much the stickiness of frame
attending
to framing.
None the
less, frame break,
for the
lack of straightforwardness,
is
potentially an is-ness
or the
path of undressing the frame,
and
therefore an unspecified ooze
of
is-ness located everywhere
in
between definiteness,
yet
somewhere just outside of
common
everyday observation.
It is
somewhere ever so near
to almost
every sensory intake
but not!
Vacations
are the Neanderthals
of frame
break endeavors.
They can
be very large, extended
and thus
consuming.
They can
devour large chunks
of time
and space.
They can
consume massive amounts
of daily
attention and course,
yet be
specified for us,
as
having easy access
to ‘same
ol same ol’.
They
feature comparative creature comfort
and many
levels of the superlatives of know.
Potentially,
enlightenment,
can be a
frame break,
a long
drawn out, possibly permanent,
course
of frame break.
Relentless
and un-rewarded
as that
may sound,
it is a
way of being
that has
no familiarity, no value,
no
common sense of worth,
wouldn't
know a bargain to buy,
can't
really be eventually construed
as a
vacation from ordinary life,
would be
inaccurate to refer to it
as
permanent,
but
still somewhere out there
on the
far side of frame break.
It is
probably deep beneath the expected
in the
heart-heat of frame,
just
like how human bodies
are way
mostly space
and
pretty much empty space at that.
But yet
we labor the mass of it.
We
politicize this mass as it.
We
deeply depend on the mass
to
occupy our symbols,
to slow
down and dim our perceptions,
so that
these notions
of
constant and solid and static
seem to
apply.
Where
recognition has a life of reference
and our
knowing seems to give us a swagger
of
relevant impact.
Frame is
a damn good fulfillment
of
experience, as experience became
a great
concept that turns out to be
another
surrogate to is-ness
as we
responsively pay all the reality bills
by
living it, right deep in the heart of frame,
in the
refrain of frame break.
Yet
there goes is-ness,
un-massed,
unnoticed,
til the
twain of never . . .
Such is
the nature of frame
and
frame breaks . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment