Lying * 10/25/12

Lying, the nature of lying,

the self-observation of lying,

the act of lying,

the environment of lying,

the consensual understanding

of lying, the moral, amoral,

immoral tenets of lying,

the very fabric upon which

lying has a perceivable existence,

are all postured on a shallow bedrock

that is, in its very presumed way

of life, a collection of falsehoods

and contrivances

and dysfunctional assumptions

that float its relevance

as a keynote to our consciousness.

Yikes, what a sentence!

Okay, let me try

to say this in other ways.

As long as we claim to be

functional from Newtonian mindsets,

lying is a fundamental given.

As long as we are committed

to language as communication

and not the essence of conveyance,

we are subject to a fractional account

as implied but falsely so,

as conclusionary certitudes.

As long as we thrive on depiction

and symbology, agreement to agree,

and the presumptive basis

of expectations, we live in and promote

the land of noble lies

as a way of consciousness.

Noble lies can be trite,

in personal comparisons

or grand as in cultural denials.

Lying is based on what is said

rather than and more importantly so,

where it is said from within.

Self-consciousness is a working member

of the lying core,

either actively or passively,

which then of itself can translate

into acts of omission

or acts of commission.

The work of understanding,

that cannot swim to the source

of the say, is inadequate

but very real for the state

of shared consciousness

assumed to be “reality”!

Unless there is immersive empathy

as a deeply functional primary

in this process, and that this process

is basically quantum in nature

as a oneness, we, as humans,

have pompously decided to

Self-indulgently agree with ourselves

in that entitlement way that begets,

as a side process of fastidiousness,

positionality, which then addresses “lying”.

If we actually “got each other”

in a quantum conscious way,

lying would not exist

and it would be non-operational

since there would be no separation

to use techniques like account,

justification, “now, tell me the truth”,

a court of law, or language

in the fallible ways

we currently imbibe it.

Psychology and ethics,

if they actually existed of then,

would imply profoundly different

and deeper complexities

as immersive understanding.

Phenomenology, may exist as an art form, 

trippy, but not a higher minded way

of oneness embrace.

To claim a diligence

and subsequent imperative

about the impact of lying as fixable

is to deny the basic deep-well nature

of consciousness.

Reality based on content representation

is a falsehood

exceedingly promoted as culture,

government, and the need for social order.

All of this is a preoccupation

dumb-down process.

We seriously damage sensory usage

with judgment, account, expectancy goals,

and linear mindsets

and call that fit and order,

all personal growth.

Language, in its back-story, aliases,

hidden agenda, assumes separation,

in order to frame what is to be said

as import and relevant.

In a quantum way,

we are far from a oneness sense,

as species, as a planet,

or as participants in (our) the universe.

Lying, as an important trivial index,

let’s us know how transcendently far

we, as a oneness, will have to go.

We present and promote the experience

of life to be an unfolding series of,

“to live for” stills. Memorable events,

even just the nature

of these events themselves,

as to how they present a frameable life, 

contribute to the shortcomings

of the flat screen reality of consciousness.

Our notion of addressing integrity,

as if it is a character aspect related to lying,

is as humorously dubious

as a Buddhist premise 

not to consciously intend to kill anything, 

yet driving down a highway

in a car, forfeits insect lives most every mile

of that journey!

The way we have trained our minds

into retention, the way we use ‘implore

and besiege’ with language, 

the massive connectivity implied by symbology,

are all fertile grounds for the cultivation

and the harvest of liars and those

who preoccupy themselves

with their positions as watchdogs on alert

to the lying cult that is out there!

We are not holographically dishonest,

but at this time, and by the means

we use as daily techniques,

we are very limited to be in a consciousness,

as a oneness consciousness.

If we were where lying is an inoperative

then we would get where we,

as apparent individuals, are coming from,

and in doing so, get the shadows,

the blind spots, the vulnerabilities,

the traumas to unravel, the emotional seats 

and hotbeds that need expression

for the spirit to arise and come forth

as the oneness consciousness 

that is in residence but yet unrevealed . . .

When we are the consummate environment

of another being,

they cannot lie to you.

Oh they can lie all they want

but they are not lying to you.

You see the fabric of their circumstance

as their consciousness wholly portrays it

for themselves and you share in that journey

as it expresses you.

If that is so,

it is pointless and distractive for you

to call it out as lying and therefore deny

the benefits you receive

from the deep connectivity with that being

as the journey of experiencing

duly provides . . .