Fatal errors to isness * 9/25/12

The fatal errors to isness

as a consciousness,

are the popular usages

and over pronounced techniques

of self-consciousness.

Namely, experience itself,

as a primary method 

of self-consciousness

is the major challenge

if isness is a presentable stage

of enlightenment.

These techniques:

being mindfully referential,

nominality,

the upkeep of sanity,

the presumption of certitude,

any duality perspective,

and the world

of mental equivalency,

all contribute

to a self aware consciousness

that denies deeper emersion

into a quantum sense

of beingness.

All methods of in-time awareness,

as self corrections and grounding,

hamper enlightenment presence.

All of the pronounceable particulars

in deeper emersion,

if there are any

that can be construed

as noteworthy,

are not delineated from the whole.

These features,

integral to essential emptiness

for a transitioning

self-consciousness view,

are the living substance

of means

for this essence emersion.

Where we are as a consciousness,

in the pursuit of character,

we feature a demonstration

of evidential behavioral elements

to be rigorously monitored

and attended,

as our self-consciousness,

a sort of beside our self

but as our self.

While there is another notion

of personal integrity

which features integration

of subtle but dynamic self elements

as the expression and celebration

of the deeper yet already present

but unrevealed,

welling spirit of being.

Isness as enlightenment

has a gaze

full of blessed emptiness

as its apparent focus.

In a quantum perspective,

the notation of any particulars

is out of phase

and dysfunctional

as a focus method.

In a quantum world,

mind retrieval

as self-conscious awareness,

produces celebratory presence

and not a certitude of particulars.

Our current method

of mind retrieval is an overused

and subsequently overrated 

minor participant in consciousness.

As long as reality

is an attempt 

to reverse engineer 

enlightenment as a goal,

isness requires

a retooling of surrender within

and a profound loss of aspects

of self-consciousness

as observational baggage  . . .

Isness is not a collection

of parts to make a whole.

Isness is not part-able.

It is a seamless whole,

all fields within one,

yet undefined

and, in the manifest,

and flourishing . . .