Is the passage of timelessness
a way, outside of experience?
In all ways, is timelessness
a contradiction
to the experiential premise?
By all means, is timelessness
confined within a continuum
outside of its own definition?
Have we only set out to find
everything we can then name
and then have named,
as if all things
were that simple of a task
and the accomplishment is
just to check it off
of our previously precious
cognitive list?
But what is this list
if but a step in the wrong direction?
And is this step
every time, then an error of decision?
As an error of itself
by being a false presumption to start?
What if looking
with presumptions of self identification
was entirely a false construction
from a false source within?
What if as a construction,
it is falsely reflective
of whom we are to be looking
into, at, or for?
This passage for us
of timelessness . . . . .
Apparently born as a concept,
mindful by intention and focus,
but thrives beyond identification.
Timelessness, really has no passage.
It is a contradicted descriptive,
yet living within us
by some kind of paradoxical means.
And so, what is the passage
of timelessness? (to you?)
No comments:
Post a Comment