we both get the surfacey and the deep,
but not so much
the otherwise interactionals.
you have procedural prominence in mind,
where as I have curiosity privatized.
you prefer being a responsible party,
I tend to be monkish.
I want to demystify you,
you want to be decision made.
I have inward travel-desire,
you desire outer world travel.
you have interest as upkeep.
I have interests from curiosity.
your feeling-range is kept close to the chest,
yet my feeling-range
is not socially appropriate.
we both deeply care,
but have varied means
of awareness and procedure.
I find each of us
accommodating to the other.
I say easy is worth carving up.
you say definitely,
with a conclusion from search.
I want discovery out of the abstract.
you want definite out of need.
our relationals to each other are complex
in varied different presenting ways.
I could feel sorry on the surface,
but more deeply committed
to inward insight.
you have compelling observations
that guide you into action or restraint.
you have nurturance as a self-response.
I have caring,
as a private almost secret enterprise.
you have caring as potential responsibility.
I don't generally agree to just agree.
if you don't care, for you, no need to agree.
you have the aptitude of a hunter.
I have stupid simple joys of the day.
my mind-time is not real in a worldly way.
your mind-time is overly worldly, demanded.
I live in the world
of what you don't say, but think.
you live in a world
where what I say, is profoundly abstract.
you see yourself as feminine preoccupied.
I see myself as circumstantially gendered.
for me, nothing is ever rendered as fair,
but everything is possibly in question.
you have pragmatic demands,
that constitute a need for timing and order.
I don't know how to alter your disposition.
you seem to have thick skin.
I appear as quite easily disinterested,
or else scheming towards a future in mind.
you radically observe and posture yourself, accordingly.
I have hunting skills of human nature
but also tears.
do we each know
what high level enjoyment is?
yet we each feel middle-ground absent
from the other . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment