the all of essence

all of essence is non-locational, 

non-specific.

it is solely reflective of the method use 

upon inquiry.

it is non-participatory 

of time and space articulation.

revelation is a sense 

and of that sense, 

revealing of itself as method,

which is our mirroring approach 

from specificity towards non-specificity.

the formula of essence has no parts,

has no equates, 

is made of non-quantifiable

and to put it in motion, 'is',

so refined as composed 

of both everything

and non-thing, 

before manifest became

of that which exists of non-existence, 

before nominalizing, 

before the orientation of languaging 

had notational specificity as an orientation, 

as we would have to conceive of 

by naming it.

we would exhaust of conceptualizing

before revelation had a necessity of means.

we are kept in our own exile 

by our means of inquiry.

we seem to want freedom to exist 

as the lowest common denominator 

of a sensory world resolve,

as if dumb-down was the formula 

for an essence to formalize into existence.

since we accepted the concept of self

and the adaptation to brain as usage,

we have dampened the search 

of self identity

to be of self, 

as if source

rather than self as an illusion,

used to leverage a sense of being

independent of its natural state

as non-existent but also present,

but unrealized as such.

we have dimensional disparity 

as our primary questioning means,

when questioning of itself

is a false premise of origin.

even a concept of manifest 

is a false orientation.

essence is everything 

before manifest occurs.

there is no concept of deliverance,

no observer status to advance to.

next is now falsely preconceived

as a reflection of the workings 

of conception itself.

mindful is still a wardrobe of being

and being is always nude of this

in its natural state.

we have rules as ramblings, 

for the purposes of a here to a there.

we agree to agree in much the same way.

we have isness as operational 

by observance. 

none of these used frequencies 

are more than 

just localized mind-fill conjecture.

we attempt to resonate by contemplation,

by a reduction into identification

is a default premise of our means.

everything we identify,

falsely identifies by our labeling method.

we have to become that, 

beyond the method we use to name it

and the techniques we use to identify.

the universe has no audience perspective 

as function.

function is idiomatic 

unto its secular self-means.

we have consciousness as an entrapment 

and experience as 

an all inclusive audience perspective. 

we play the game of watching

and watching what we play 

as a means of experiential wherewithal.

we sensory download instead 

of sensory uptake.

therefore we function 

as the religion of reductionism.

our idea of ascension is comprehension

as if there is a greater whole

and we are approaching 

with an esteemed cognizance 

as our homemade method.

the mind is more than working parts,

but laboring is our prerogative 

to pursue and perceive.

we are blessed victimization 

by our own calling.

we are a choir pursuing vocalization.

singing is our form 

of reductionistic commingling.

oneness has no where 

and no what 

to the it of it, 

that has no need of existence 

to its being,

that constantly speak of itself

by non-existence 

overwhelming comprehension's presence . . .