Happy is an ambient state.
It is a self-generative presence.
Happy is not in summary.
It is not a result.
Happy is not at the stage
of a conclusion.
There is incidental broadcast
to happy.
Happy may really
transcend circumstance.
Yet for those on the hunt,
it can be called out
for certitude and clarification.
“Are you happy?”
“Why are you so happy?”
Which may make you
self-consciously aware
about being happy.
In a world of justification,
you might have to rethink
or make up
self-conscious reasons
for happy,
at least create a logic
for happy to present,
or suggest a show of events
as if a show of hands
as a form of agreement
for them to confirm
your happiness.
You can’t just be happy.
It has to be a consequence
and storable as earned.
If you were happy
before you started whatever
and you’re still happy after,
that does not help those
in search of happiness
as to how to get happy.
Surely people want
what happy is
but they only want it
as acquisition would provide.
It is perceived
as if life itself
is a negative affirmation
away from happiness.
For them,
it has to be something
like a wardrobe purchase,
or they want to portray happy
as if that is to be happy.
One would have to do something
in order to get something
and then call that
as a result, “happy”.
Happy is probably less
than effortful or intentioned.
What if happy was a given,
inside out, like a state of being,
unless you worked against it?
Like you were happy
to start with,
but made up some
outside in reasons
to not be happy
until you were preoccupied
or overwhelmed
with reasoning to not be happy,
and also believed
that happy is dependent
upon circumstances around you
rather than
just how you are with yourself.
If you spend a lot of time
trying to get happy,
but that happy is based on effort,
and happy is essentially
not composed of effort
or self-conscious observation
then any happy that you get
is a hollow victory,
short-lived composed
of means and at affect diminishing.
If happy was linked to expectations
as if that was the gearbox to happy,
then you could only be happy
as a measure of expectations met.
Does happiness have
a given environment
to cause it or support it?
Happiness cannot be assigned.
It sort of is an inward state
and may exude from there as such.
Like I said to start with,
happy is an ambience,
without all that pre and post
as justifiable clutter . . .
Happy is sort of beyond
self-consciousness
which exists for us
as the curious double dare.
I am asking you
if you are happy,
is sort of like saying,
“prove to me by my standards
that you are happy
in a way that I can relate to
based on my beliefs
about how happy works
to begin with.
Display for me
what I think happy would be
because I am asking,
given that I want to be it too
and directly so.
And so I am looking
everywhere around me
for clues,
you being one of them.”
So if happy were an objectification
then you could receive it
from an outside source.
You could attain it
as if you were not of it,
but feel like you could be it,
at least by proving
that you are it,
(like every time you check!)
Happy . . . that is.
Although, this appears to be
what billboards do,
happy is more like a pheromone.
Maybe there is a chemical basis,
but naturally, it is self-induced,
then once it is self-discovered
it becomes self-permitted.
We can share happy
but I can’t really make you happy.
That is an exploitative illusion.
Happy has no look.
It has no justifiable feel.
Happy . . . wow!
Get away from the word
the concept,
the expectation
the self in agreement
and be . . .
Happy does not take the time off
to know itself.
Happy is.
Look, anyone who knows
they are happy
is multi-tasking
right before your eyes . . .