true pure emotion,
in the essence of itself,
does not play the mind-game
of value.
comparative truth is the go-between,
the negotiator of mind-presentables,
for emotional indoctrination
to acknowledge and approve.
emotion doesn't even name anything by wordage.
mind promotes such languaging.
emotion is rendered as subservient to mind
by the ongoings of the languaged culture of experience.
emotion has empathy without mindful consideration.
by the time mind has registered,
there is an equation of consideration in place,
based upon separate from as a self,
and then how to be of assistance there of.
it only takes nanoseconds for all of this to occur.
the original feelings are immersive
as if not time registered,
but then, as thought revealed.
there is a linear production mindfully happening.
emotion does not participate in value
in the way the mind does.
emotion has value like harmonics,
where like attracts like.
mind has value as contextual,
with considerations in appraisal as a view.
mind has self as a fundamental premise
that orients the following of methods to pursue,
while emotion has a oneness principle in place,
where like attracts like in a timeless fashion,
where feel is instantaneously volumetric,
while thought requires cognition and subsequent account.
value is a mind-game.
fear as motivation is used to stir the mix.
consider supply and demand to be a stirring instrument.
thought is tea served.
emotion is the air we breathe.
aroma is an attempt at thought distraction,
remembering that metaphor is a mind method
and feel is a form of oneness occupancy,
even if not cognitively identified as such.
mind is the self identified
while emotion is the collective,
yet not mindfully identified.
pure emotion is a superior brain
but realization would be
a mindfully humbling act beyond acknowledgment.
emotion needs no means of agreement.
emotion is oneness already
yet existing in a relatively unconscious format
called,
know yourself to be . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment