the issues that are up for the claims:
acquisitional versus actualization,
the methods of control
versus the path of focusing.
where within, control has its drivenness,
while focus has its drawnness.
skills outwardly acquired
or skills inwardly discovered.
the taking command of yourself
or the coming into yourself.
is the self package-able in the obtaining
or compositional in the uncovering?
sensing for a command of self
or feeling for integration from within oneself?
the surrendering of resistance
or the embracing of inwardness as surrender.
pursue to fix
or create out of reframe.
to clarify for the purpose of understanding
or to re-immerse oneself in the trust to be.
feeling compelled
yet not inwardly called.
accomplished
but not actualized.
the integrity of surrender to a sense of a higher self
or realizing the temporal value of accomplishment.
channeling ones higher self
as an expansion of spiritual witness
by being the embodiment of flow
or being the bystander
to one's own act-outs.
knowledge does not guarantee integration,
it just allows for accountability.
noting the differences between being inwardly called
or outwardly compelled.
one's self-narrative having needs
to be creativity composed
or rationally constructed?
who is the part of oneself
who does all the think
for the thoughts that you get?
who is that part of oneself
that generates the feelings
that eventually surface
registered as felt
and in their presence,
fulfill as confirming?
thus the predicament
that soul searching,
lingers . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment