greatness versus gifted

to question the differences, 

between greatness and gifted.

to be in the awareness of greatness

or the presence of gifted?

is to be on the cutting edge of experience,

with the specific differences evident

between normatives and nuances, 

achievements versus experimentations,

and accomplishments versus endeavors. 

the location for the sense of intimacy,

in either case, is quite different.

greatness has reputational carriage,

while gifted has a potential intimacy. 

greatness has played to audience perspective

and had to adjust to that,

as a benefit or a liability,

while gifted can remain low-key in passing.

greatness is a term which has a public circulation.

gifted considers self-traits as its means 

and displays, having a sense of privacy to them.

great has show permission or audience favor,

while gifted allows 

for more observation of nuance expressed.

it is not that great is not gifted

but either, by action or medium, 

has created a following,

or observation, then by perception. 

creations of 'great' as description

is usually an audience intro.

there then is an expectation 

that lives with all parties involved.

gifted can carry on, low key and passing,

without others in the grandness of audience.

not that someone could partake 

of what a gifted person does,

but the intake has a lot more to do 

with the subtly of what is

and less to do with the production value

of the eventual out come.

gifted can present as a person with a feel.

greatness assumes a feel and lives for the outcome.

one is product orientated, 

while the other is process based.

even if you were great at yawning or sneezing,

people have endpoint result expectations.

great says more about what you do

while gifted speaks to how you do what you do.

great and gifted have different source-point residence.

not that they don't potentially encompass much the same,

but how they are emphasized and valued,

leads to very different internal private expression.

taken to be the medium of occupancy,

great puts a lot on automatic 

because of its execution basis and bias,

while gifted can have lots of privacy in the doing.

there is massive distinction

yet much overlap is possible.

audience perspective is a profound consideration,

even financial outcome may come into play.

great has to have migrating to demonstrable,

while gifted can have more of a privacy to it.

comparative truth wants greatness to surface.

gifted wants self-intimacy explored first hand.

for gifted has so much more latitude available,

while great almost demands a scale of measurement.

so similar yet so different.

so overlapped but oriented towards different expression.

maybe great and gifted are mere audience terms

and not any measure in the first person sense.

to say that you are great at something

has audience expectations and needs,

while being gifted can have feel 

and a private self experience outcome

at such a more private level of existence.

if great defines one,

it also imprisons them,

while gifted can have at life, with benefits,

valued as an inner experience expressing itself.

life, as great, travels a very different path

than life as gifted is allowed.

great has pasture and grazing,

gifted has privacy, is an otherwise option.

great is to spectate at or be with,

while gifted is to inquire and feel.

is it that we ask role models to be both?

great at the projection of appearances

and gifted in the means of presenting?

gifted would walk me along a path

alone and somewhat complete,

while great has demands

and one has to live them alive, 

as their existence . . .