the awareness of life, as it registers,
is the immediacies of the recent impressing.
art recognized is another dimension,
calling out, gasping for the breath of spirit
to save oneself from the onslaught, informing.
one can have a view of this view
and call it philosophical or psychological,
dependent on the immediacy of a need-response.
it all plays as the in-depths
that experience offers.
and where it commonly resides,
there is a voice behind the normative,
a voice that articulates some other dimension,
a view beyond where conclusions go,
a part of being
that does not rightfully fit in
or recognize the whole of self out of living.
it gets the act-outs taken to be real
but premises that,
for all of the surface of life.
there are currents that travel with poignancy,
that do not take stands or reality pose.
they offer insight and depth of feel
but do not and will not interfere
or override the apparent-ices
from the onslaught of circumstance.
it's always dimensions added
and never the business of override,
as if a softer voice spoken clearly
but not commanding attention,
just offered.
how many times every day does this happen?
cues missed by sensory habit's feed
and our awareness functioning in automatic.
my eyes serve two masters.
and yet, I only have eyes
that feed the momentum of commentary.
yet, I am aware that they see
in a different time-dimension.
in a normal sense, I would have to say
that they pre-see.
they hunt at what is coming.
they work for a part of me
in full guidance that I habitually ignore.
we go our separate ways
and yet are, one-in-the-same.
I wanted a sentience to occur,
but I plead with denial as my means.
I wanted insight to assist
but I ramble past the views.
I wanted the insistence of stillness
but I plead that boredom has come.
so where is the when I long for?
how can I ask of myself,
by means of righteous denial's plead?
if I have a sense of witness, self-witness,
how can I get behind all of that,
when I am wildly conditioned
to be up front and fully occupied?
it feels like I am a single flashlight,
no matter how bright,
but in a vastly larger room,
then coming and going takes me.
I only have a sense of direction for going.
I don't truly sense the embodiment
or the means of embrace for that.
I identify with the mass of me
and the form of the act-out.
I don't get the presence of me, really.
I get the presence of others,
but somehow that plays.
but I don't have a concept
for how or what to say.
I just get the fumbling and the wrangling,
and the supposedly moral
and the sense of self as a projection.
but beyond that,
it is vast
and to me, apparently vacant.
if proof is my means,
then I live in the ever unfolding denial.
I can't say I know better.
but I do have a sense
that does not relinquish this feel.
it includes the spirit of me
beyond the evident
and the subsequent act-out.
I live for that to come forth,
to become second nature
to each moment in passing.
to be the presence of me, I recognize,
beyond circumstance and conditioning
and the incessancy of habits into the unconscious.
I want for that,
out of the here and now.
I would even give up wanting
for that to become so,
even to give up the know,
to be . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment