my supposed unconscious mind
is not limited to this lifetime of experiences.
so the cross referencing is always in process.
they first appear as feelings,
impressions that then
conscious brain registers,
out of perspective but evident.
episodes unto themselves,
but not naturally linked
to outer-world experience.
they appear as standalones,
unlinked but possibly stimulated
by outer circumstance,
some fabric of connection,
but not logically deployed into reasoning.
sometimes layering occurs,
whereby simultaneous storylines
are being presented,
but not similar in nature,
just juxtapose to each other.
not sure what the common thread
for then is.
sometimes I see others in this way.
they present as a definite person
in a normal sense
but also a second movie-like set
of images appear,
as if two movies
on the same visual screen together
but independent in content and display.
linked through that person's presence,
though they may not be aware
of the second sense.
not puzzling to me
but interesting as in a delve,
to see if this person has any recall
of the other sense.
sometimes they do
but not in the same present frame
of reference.
just a mention of the second movie
may set off a response in the person
of feelings they have about that topic,
that seems very private to them internally
but not in the present context of asking.
so much is going on in a human,
beyond what the conscious mind handles,
as if we are the lake
that allows the boat of us
on the surface to travel.
buoyant in its appearance
of separateness ongoing,
even though deeper currents
within prevail unannounced.
what is claimed as unconscious,
is claimed by this side of order
about the other,
as if a small brother of self-consciousness
is whining for attention
in the presence
of a wider presence big brother,
who shows no natural interest
in the dilemma at hand.
big brother or unconscious mind as termed,
is busy
in an alternate universe of awareness,
somewhat nonlinear
but reasonably compositional.
there is linkage happening
grandly all the time
but the reaction to it in this realm
is minimal,
a kind of recognition fluidity exists
as functional
and judgment or conclusions
are not the means used.
there is a viscosity
of thought-action occurring.
maybe experience
as we so claim consciously is impeded
and unconscious experience functions
with an efficiency
that the conscious mind basically lacks
at this time.
maybe the conscious mind is
too much audience to it,
as an existence thriving on affect
rather than integrating with it,
as a kind of false separatism
of occupancy occurring.
what wonders when
the two kinds of consciousness
meet in a clearing to each other.
we are that process ongoing.
stay tuned, with a deepening awareness,
as best as you can . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment