faint links in the attic mind

the obviousness of first-person experience

is falsely dressed in drag as conclusions

yet questions are the carving tools 

of a curious mind.

and a curious mind is a sensory skill 

without an obvious given means,

for mind-skills made out of this meaninglessness. 

dig deeper.

the best tools are keenly developed 

from questioning 

the questioner's questioning.

answers are only mile markers 

along the way.

my disguise is to go from a here to a there,

when I am always both. 

studying the disguises 

of their apparent differences 

as if that is my means.

simulation like this does not exist 

except as a byproduct 

of an observational method 

in a time-space perceptual style.

generally we are a brain-state style 

of observation. 

we commonly use the call of experience.

it feeds on its own insularity 

and then projects its process outwardly 

as a virus impotizing by observation 

into an isolation's sense of isness.  

whereby reasoning is a windfall of errors, 

conjoined loosely as evidential.

by that means, we have thought as luggage 

that we take with us everywhere,

where identification makes familiar commonplace.

but faint-links, in the attic mind, 

are working in a different medium.

experience may not get a ticket 

to ride up there.

travel is to come upon context,

yet not so much interest in content,

more about the means of isness 

rather then its apparent projection.

I don't go attic mind as a person

but more so as a medium-participant

for the world within a world

or the world outside the world .

know is not a in-house residence,

just a passerby . . .