Communication as justification

Communication is

its own insular justification.

Meaning seems to seal the deal

as meaning is a infusion of myopia.

Surely there are secondary rules

as to what gets the attention

to be meaning full.

Meaning has a background agenda

towards accountability, justification

and rationally sequential clarity.

Meaning paroles

the apparent framework

as the text to be focused on.

Context is the prison

of appearance and approximations.

This popular paradigm

of conscious attention

is its own falsehood

of the essence expressed.

Newborns and elderly,

close to their death,

seem to express their spirit

more directly.

The time,

in between these two states,

is contractually

and consummately taken up

with a storyline and a character.

Previous experience seems

to offer support and allegiance

for reacting to life

with expectations and reactions

that supports the characterization

of self

in a contractually ongoing way.

The process

of interfacing with everyone

yields this as a social

and cultural adaptation to being.

Conveyance is as a lost art form

of being

as in,

”it is not what you say

but what you convey”

that would more directly represent

the spirit of your being.

Empathy is its own method

for connectedness.

Telepathy, in this regard,

is a capacity to connect

without certain assumed

restraints to boundaries.

‘Feeling following breath’

is first consciousness,

maybe our first order

of communicating

outside the womb . . .