from immersion to embodiment

what is the chrysalis work embraced

from immersion to embodiment?

for immersion is a surrender.

for all of the technique of experience

must be expunged of its method,

no more of the subject-object intercourse,

no more the observance thereof

as if traits acknowledged,

as if comparative truth works as an operative,

as if surface-to-surface has any relevancy.

the integrity becomes of constituency.

motion is present as fluidity unto itself.

there are no more of moving parts

but clearly a moving wholeness instilled.

immersion is as a transcendence. 

identification has no separate parts invested.

one is consumed 

beyond what recognition could offer.

immersion is its own integrity of motion

as energetically an ongoing expression thereof.

and in that transition,

there becomes the presence of embodiment.

embodiment presents as a presence, 

an unintended radiance outgoing,

a signature of integrity expressed

but not defined as such.

experience will make of it 

what it wants to.

embodiment has no interest of that kind or intent.

whatever was, 

has now become of what is,

yet has no method of claim.

isness as embodiment seeks no other.

immersion to embodiment is evolutionary of means.

we are all of this chrysalis work embraced.

our immersion is still very roundabout

and our embodiment is without a clarity beyond reason,

yet the drawnness within

takes us to that path of inclusion.

however vast it appears,

however estranged we method,

the seed-essence of oneness beckons . . .