the next step

what if the next step 

does not get to further on?

that change is just the revisitation 

of the same method,

with a new experience of trappings.

and that, for then, we solidly invest

in the interest of these new trappings,

until the same method used

is just a reoccurrence almost unrevealed.

and so another next step is called for,

but change is still the method used.

oh sure, there are the novelties 

of new whistles and louder clangs,

but what mindset can leap of its own accord

and land with transformational of the mind?

what method of framing

can take up its efforts 

and be gone,

making way for something other than?

as in a perception of beyond,

an immersion of the more real,

less the safety of onlooker status,

less of comparative truth occupancy,

and more of the depth of being, realized,

but not as mental equivalency,

but as beingness revealed to be?

how strange is that,

to live into a deeper truth,

than abided by or commonly understood?

with more enormity that than, cogitation can conclude,

with more source-full than add-on or change.

simply depth of being discovered, 

by being of it.

and not as apparel of a versionary us.

even then, for the notion of a next step

to be obsolete, for the transcendence of usage,

blessedly, as if we spoke from our hearts,

rather than from our minds . . .